Social Needs Screening in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Addressing adverse social determinants of health is an upstream approach to potentially improve child health outcomes and health equity. We aimed to determine if systematically screening and referring for social needs in hospitalized pediatric patients increased families' enrollment in publicly available resources. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial at a large urban children's hospital enrolled English-speaking caregivers of patients 0 to 36 months of age on the general pediatrics service from June 2016 to July 2017. The intervention arm received the WE CARE Houston social needs intervention (screener and resource referrals based on screening results and receptiveness to help); the control arm received standard of care. Baseline social risk data were collected for all participants. Caregivers who screened positive for mental health need, substance abuse, or domestic violence received additional support, including from social workers. The primary outcome was enrollment in resources at 6 months postdischarge. Univariate and multivariable analysis was performed to identify associations. RESULTS: Our study sample consisted of 413 caregivers from diverse sociodemographic/socioeconomic backgrounds. Overall, 85% of study participants had ≥1 social risk (median 2, range 0-9). WE CARE Houston identified caregiver employment, health insurance, primary care physician, depression, childcare, smoking, and food resources as the most prevalent social needs. Among these, caregivers were most receptive to resources for childcare, mental health, health insurance, and primary care. There was no significant difference in enrollment in new resources by study arm. CONCLUSION: Screening for social needs in the hospital is feasible and can result in the identification of social needs, but further work is needed to successfully address these needs.

Assessing the Factors That Influence Medical Students' Attitudes Toward Working With Medically Underserved Populations.

Introduction: The needs of medically-underserved populations (MUPs) are consistently outpacing the number of physicians caring for them. Medical students' motivations toward working with MUPs consistently decline as they progress through medical school. Given the shortage of doctors caring for MUPs, the objective of our study was to further investigate factors that influence medical students' motivation to work with MUPs while they progress through their education. By identifying these elements, we hope to recommend identified factors within medical education that support the development of more physicians who care for MUPs. Methods: This cross-sectional study is an assessment of medical students at the University of Texas at Southwestern Medical School (UTSW). The study utilized the Medical Student Attitudes Toward the Underserved (MSATU), a validated survey that assesses medical student motivations toward the provision of medical care to MUPs. Surveys were administered at three time points selected to represent key transition points in medical education. Results: There was no significant difference between MSATU scores among the three time points. MSATU scores were higher among students who identified as female, had higher empathy, had higher value placed on teamwork, and had higher community-centeredness. MSATU scores were also higher among students planning to specialize in primary care compared to students planning to specialize in a non-primary care field (P=.239). Conclusion: This study identifies factors associated with high MSATU scores within UTSW medical education, including female identification, higher empathy score, higher emphasis on teamwork, higher community-centeredness, and plans to practice primary care. Additionally, the results support maintenance of MSATU scores across all three time points. Future research should examine individual-level data to determine whether individual students are maintaining their MSATU scores or if individual fluctuations are neutralized by group changes.

Food Perceptions and Dietary Changes for Chronic Condition Management in Rural Peru: Insights for Health Promotion.

Peru is undergoing a nutrition transition and, at the country level, it faces a double burden of disease where several different conditions require dietary changes to maintain a healthy life and prevent complications. Through semistructured interviews in rural Peru with people affected by three infectious and noninfectious chronic conditions (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and neurocysticercosis), their relatives, and focus group discussions with community members, we analyzed their perspectives on the value of food and the challenges of dietary changes due to medical diagnosis. The findings show the various ways in which people from rural northern Peru conceptualize good (buena alimentación) and bad (mala alimentación) food, and that food choices are based on life-long learning, experience, exposure, and availability. In the context of poverty, required changes are not only related to what people recognize as healthy food, such as fruits and vegetables, but also of work, family, trust, taste, as well as affordability and accessibility of foods. In this paper we discuss the complexity of introducing dietary changes in poor rural communities whose perspectives on food are poorly understood and rarely taken into consideration by health professionals when promoting behavior change.